Blog · Directors & limited companies
The £12,570 salary plus dividends formula isn’t wrong. It’s generic. Here’s what it misses, with real numbers. A six-minute read.
By Umang · Published November 2026 · ← All guides
Last updated 1 November 2026. All figures are 2026/27 rates.
In short: The “£12,570 salary plus dividends” formula you’ve read on every contractor forum isn’t wrong. It’s just generic. Apply it to money you don’t actually need yet, or let it tip you over £100,000, and it quietly costs you thousands a year.
It’s a plan I hear on first calls more than any other, so let’s give it a face. Take a director we’ll call James. Salary at £12,570, every single year. Everything else out as dividends, every single year. He built it off a spreadsheet he found on a contractor forum four years ago and hasn’t touched it since. “It’s tax efficient,” he’d tell you, like it was a fact rather than a starting point.
It was, once. Run his actual numbers and it’s now costing him just over £15,000 a year. Not because the formula is wrong. Because he stopped asking whether it still applied to him.
This is the sentence I hear most. Usually followed by “dividends are more tax efficient than salary, aren’t they?” Sure, on the pound you’re taking out right now, dividends usually beat salary because you skip National Insurance. But that only compares two ways of getting money into your pocket this year. It says nothing about whether this year is when you should be taking it at all.
Here’s the bit nobody mentions on the forums. If you don’t actually need the cash, taking it out as a dividend is one of the most expensive things you can do with it.
James has £30,000 of profit sitting in the company that he doesn’t need. He’s already covered his living costs for the year through salary and an earlier dividend. This £30,000 is pure “might as well” money.
Taken as a dividend, here’s what actually happens to it:
That’s a combined tax rate of just under 53% on money he didn’t need. HMRC never sends you a letter explaining this. You only find out by doing the sums, or by having someone do them for you.
The same £30,000, paid into his pension as an employer contribution, sidesteps both of those taxes. It’s normally a deductible business expense (subject to the usual “wholly and exclusively” rule and the £60,000 annual allowance), so it comes off profit before corporation tax ever touches it. No income tax and no National Insurance on the way in. The full £30,000 goes to work for him, not £14,167.
The catch, and it’s a real one: that money is now locked away until he can access his pension. It isn’t free money, it’s deferred money. It’s taxed later, often at a lower rate, with 25% of it normally tax free when he draws it, instead of taxed twice right now. For cash he doesn’t need this year, that trade is usually worth making. For cash he does need, it obviously isn’t. This is a decision to make deliberately, not a default to fall into either way.
£12,570 salary and dividends for the rest is still a sensible starting point for most one-person companies. I’m not telling you to abandon it. I’m telling you it’s a default, not a decision, and it needs checking against your actual year, not just copied forward from the spreadsheet you built four years ago. If you want the full walkthrough of setting your salary, dividends and pension for 2026/27, start with how to pay yourself from your limited company tax-efficiently.
Before you take anything out, ask yourself the three questions that actually matter:
If the answer to all three points the same way the forum spreadsheet does, take the dividend. If it doesn’t, you’ve just found money that was never yours to lose.
| Tax | 2026/27 |
| Personal allowance | £12,570, frozen until April 2031 |
| Personal allowance taper | £1 lost for every £2 over £100,000, gone at £125,140 |
| Dividend allowance | £500 |
| Dividend tax rates | 10.75% basic, 35.75% higher, 39.35% additional |
| Corporation tax | 19% up to £50,000, 25% over £250,000, 26.5% effective in between |
| Pension annual allowance | £60,000 for most people |
If your dividend split hasn’t been reviewed since the year you first set it up, it’s probably due one. DMs are open, or book a free consultation and we’ll run your actual numbers rather than the generic ones.
As a starting point, yes. The personal allowance is £12,570 and the dividend allowance is £500, and for most one-person companies a small salary plus dividends is still the lowest-tax way to take out money you need this year. The problem isn’t the formula, it’s applying it without question to money and circumstances it wasn’t built for.
Between £100,000 and £125,140 of total income, you lose £1 of personal allowance for every £2 earned. For dividends, that works out at an effective marginal rate of around 54% in that band.
It depends whether you need the cash. Money you don’t need this year is usually better off as an employer pension contribution, since it avoids both corporation tax and dividend tax on the way in. Money you need to live on should still come out as salary and dividends. It’s a case-by-case decision, not a rule.
Up to the £60,000 annual allowance for most people, as an employer contribution, provided it meets the normal “wholly and exclusively” test. Very high earners and anyone who has already paid in this year may have less room.
Between £50,000 and £250,000 of profit, marginal relief tapers the rate from 19% up to 25%. Each extra pound of profit in that band is effectively taxed at 26.5%. The limits are shared if you have associated companies.
Send us your company’s numbers and we’ll show you what the forum spreadsheet is missing.
Tap what you need and we will point you the right way.